School navigation

National Animal Law Competitions

2009 NALC Results

2009 NALC Results

WINNERS:

This year the Closing Argument Competition ended in a “hung jury” of sorts. The result is an unbreakable tie for first place. Incredible! Congratulations:

Cheyne Adam & David Lipschutz
Both of The John Marshall Law School

FINALISTS:

Impressive closing arguments were also presented by the finalist competitors. Congratulations:

Robyn Katz
Texas Tech University School of Law

Annmarie Robustelli
Lewis & Clark Law School

RESULTS - APPELLATE MOOT COURT

Participation in the Appellate Moot Court Competition was especially impressive this year. Many of our judges, including the three federal judges who presided over the final round, acknowledged the students’ high level of preparation and talent. Congratulations to these future lawyers!

WINNERS:

Michelle DeLappe & Nicholas Hudson
University of Washington School of Law

FINALISTS:

Bryan Telegin & Carey Whitehead
Lewis & Clark Law School

SEMI-FINALISTS:

Andrew Freeman & Zachary Norris
Lewis & Clark Law School

Hannah Faddis & Thien An Truong
New York Law School

BEST ORAL ADVOCATE:

Nicholas Hudson
University of Washington School of Law

Honorable Mention for Best Oral Advocate:

Rebecca Yanos
Duquesne University School of Law

BEST APPELLANT BRIEF:

Charles Ainscough & Gina Tomaselli
UC Berkeley Boalt Hall School of Law

Honorable Mention for Best Appellant Brief:

Hannah Faddis & Thien An Truong
New York Law School

BEST RESPONDENT BRIEF:

Bryan Telegin & Carey Whitehead
Lewis & Clark Law School

BEST OVERALL BRIEF:

Charles Ainscough & Gina Tomaselli
UC Berkeley Boalt Hall School of Law

National Animal Law Competitions

Contact Us