Professor Abrams explores parents’ rights to determine children’s education in new book
Professor Abrams explores parents’ rights to determine children’s education in new book

Lewis & Clark law professor Paula Abrams has devoted her career to constitutional issues such as equality, reproductive rights, and the tensions between environmental and human rights approaches to population policy. In her latest book, Cross Purposes: Pierce v. Society of Sisters and the Struggle over Compulsory Public Education, she journeys into new constitutional terrain—the rights of parents.
Cross Purposes delves into the 1925 Supreme Court case, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, which sought to address the fundamental question: Do parents have the right to determine how their children should be educated?
This landmark case has affected how children are educated in this country today. The underlying story, including the political and social impetus behind the case, also sheds light on how the U.S. government and citizens act when national security issues seem to threaten their way of life.
In 1922, Oregon voters passed an initiative requiring all children to attend public schools. For nativists and progressives who had campaigned for the Oregon School Bill, it marked the first victory in a national campaign to homogenize education—and ultimately the populace. Private schools, both secular and religious, vowed to challenge the law. The Catholic Church, the largest provider of private education in the country and the primary target of the Ku Klux Klan campaign, stepped forward to lead the fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
In Pierce v. Society of Sisters, the court declared the Oregon School Bill unconstitutional and ruled that parents have the right to determine how their children should be educated. Since then, Pierce has provided a precedent in many cases pitting parents against the state.
The ruling tells only part of the story and in Cross Purposes Abrams weaves together the social, historical and political context to demonstrate how a society consistently reacts to threats during times of war with highly nationalistic policies.
In this podcast, Abrams discusses the political and social landscape that bred the Oregon School Bill and the landmark decision that resulted.
Cross Purposes: Pierce v. Society of Sisters and the Struggle over Compulsory Public Education was published by the University of Michigan Press.
Law Communications is located in room 304 of Legal Research Center on the law Campus.
email jasbury@lclark.edu
voice 503-768-6605
Cell: 626-676-7923
Assistant Dean,
Communications and External Relations, Law School
Judy Asbury
Law Communications
Lewis & Clark Law School
10101 S. Terwilliger Boulevard MSC
Portland OR 97219
More Stories

Register now–July 13! Fall in Love with the Future. Empowering Local Climate Action: Education, Policy and Practice
It’s time to take solutions to the climate crisis into our own hands. Enjoy the company of others who are ready to race to save the planet.
Register here.

DWT International Writing Award winners announced
This year’s winning papers investigated how developing countries face inequities in expropriation for public purpose, and challenges to establishing standing in international environmental rights cases.

Law School Strategic Plan Focuses on the Future, Student Success and Community
“Excellence and resilience in a fast-changing world” is the focus of the Law School’s strategic plan, with efforts to “future-proof” the school and ensure students’ success.

Regulating the Rise of Data Centers in Oregon
Green Energy Institute staff and students are advancing solutions under Oregon’s POWER Act to address the environmental and economic impacts of data center expansion. The Oregon Public Utility Commission’s recent ruling, citing GEI throughout, ordered some of the most innovative and protective outcomes from a public utility commission in the nation.
