National Animal Law Competition (NALC)

NALC Logo

  • “The National Animal Law Competitions allows students with a passion for advocacy specifically related to animal issues, to hone their skills to become better advocates. I have always enjoyed advocating for people who could not speak for themselves. By competing in the National Animal Law Competitions, I learned how to craft compelling arguments and learn how to present animal law issues to people who may not be as informed of the challenges that animals face. I enjoyed my time as a competitor so much that I signed up with Animal Legal Defense Fund and have assisted The John Marshall Law School as a coach for students competing in the National Animal Law Competitions. One of the greatest testaments of NALC is that it allows law students who are unaware of the plight of companion animals, farm animals, or even animals subjected to experiments, to become better stewards of those entrusted to our care. There is nothing like watching students evolve from supporters of animal issues to advocates of animal issues.” –Anthony Sam, JD, former competitor 

  • “As a trial lawyer for more than 25 years I was very impressed with the quality of the closing arguments of all the competitors. They performed at a level I would expect of a third year prosecutor, not a law student. And the winner was absolutely fantastic, particularly in her ability to think on her feet during the final round. Finding law students interested in not just the issue but bringing those who abuse animals to justice is particularly meaningful for those of us who have been working, often seemingly alone, in animal welfare enforcement.” –Josh Marquis, JD

  • “My partner and I chose to come back to NALC because we had such a great experience last year– thoughtful judges, a well-run competition, and thought-provoking practice problems. Connecting with animal law professionals and supportive members of the bench has been a great benefit of this competition and I would do it all over again in a heartbeat.” –Anna Bennett, UC Irvine Law 3L

  • “It is really amazing to practice real skills and get feedback from the most important scholars and practitioners in animal law. The competition fosters relationships between competitors but also amongst the staff and judges.” –Stefanie Wilson, UC Irvine Law 3L

2011 Special Thanks

We could not put this event together without the help we receive from many, many individuals and institutions.  We owe them a huge thanks and appreciate all that they do!

In particular, we would like to thank the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) for their incredible support.  We are grateful for our ongoing collaboration with ALDF and for the significant work individuals at ALDF put into the National Animal Law Competitions (NALC). We could not put this event together without them.

We also owe a huge thanks to The Bob Barker Endowment Fund for the Study of Animal Rights at Harvard Law School.  We greatly appreciate its continued financial support of NALC.  Thank you to Mr. Bob Barker himself for his unwavering support of the animal law field and for being a visionary in animal law education.

Thank you also to the Student Animal Legal Defense Fund (SALDF) at Harvard Law School (HLS) for all of their hard hard work on this event and for hosting each year!  In particular, we’d like to thank HLS SALDF President Jessica Rostoker.  It’s no small feat to organize this event from across the country and we sincerely thank them for their “on the ground” support.

We would also like to give a shout out to past HLS SALDF President Justinian Doreste for his incredible work last year and for setting us up right to make 2011 our best year yet.

We owe another special thanks to William Howell in Harvard’s Dean of Students Office and to Jessica Pittenger along with the entire team in Harvard’s Events Office.  They all help us put NALC together and make it a success.  We could also never forget our friends in Harvard’s Mail Services, Ron Andrews in particular, for their help with the many heavy packages they receive and hold on our behalf until the competitions.  Thank you!!

A special thank you also goes to Dean Robert Klonoff of Lewis & Clark Law School, not only for his tremendous support of NALC, but of the Animal Law Program at Lewis & Clark.

We, of course, thank all of the student competitors, their coaches, advisers, schools, etc. along with our guest judges for all of their hard work and for traveling many miles to be a part of NALC.

Last but far, far from least, a HUGE thank you goes to the individuals who take time out of their very busy schedules to volunteer their expertise to write the problems and grade briefs, fact sheets, etc.  Those individuals are:

Appellate Moot Court Competition:

  • Susan Hightower, Adjunct Professor in Animal Law, The University of Texas School of Law (primary author of the 2011 problem);
  • Sonia Waisman, McCloskey, Waring & Waisman LLP (problem co-author, primary author of bench brief & brief grader);
  • Joan Schaffner, The George Washington U. Law School (problem co-author & brief grader);
  • Carter Dillard, Animal Legal Defense Fund (brief grader);
  • Tanith Balaban, Gordon & Rees LLP (brief grader); and
  • Denise Luk, Center for Animal Law Studies Fellow (problem editor).

Closing Argument Competition:

  • Scott Heiser, Animal Legal Defense Fund (co-author of the 2011 problem); and
  • Megan Senatori, DeWitt Ross & Stevens S.C. (co-author of the 2011 problem).

Legislative Drafting & Lobbying Competition:

  • Nancy Perry, The Humane Society of the United States (primary author of the 2011 problem); and
  • Stephan Otto, Animal Legal Defense Fund (problem editor).