The Lewis & Clark Law Review (LCLR) is a general-purpose law review publishing original scholarship from across the legal academy.
First founded as the Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law in 1996, and rededicated with a broader mission in Spring 2004, LCLR has quickly established itself as a top-50 journal. In the latest Washington & Lee citation rankings, LCLR ranked No. 40 among general-interest law reviews and No. 43 among all law reviews.
Our current issue, Volume 21 / Number 4 / 2018, is now available online. This issue features articles by Larry Catá Backer, Simona Grossi, Travis O. Brandon, Alyssa S. King, Leslie Gielow Jacobs, and Noah Marks & Jessica Ranucci. It also features notes and comments by Justine Mitsuko Bonner, and John Peckler.
Coming Fall 2018…
Our 2018 Symposium featured cutting-edge scholarship on contemporary immigration issues, particularly in the wake of President Trump’s attempts to implement various immigration policies. More information can be found Here. The issue featuring articles discussed at the Symposium is scheduled to be published in mid-2018.
The Fall Business Forum will take place on September 28, 2018. Details will be posted once available.
Information on the 2019 Law Review Symposium will be available later this year.
Information about the 2018 Summer Citation Competition is available for your review.
A Word About Copyright
Unless a particular piece in the Lewis & Clark Law Review indicates otherwise, the author of each piece in the review has granted all interested readers the right to reproduce and distribute multiple copies of the piece for classroom use in classes at institutions of higher education. This grant is applicable so long as (1) copies are distributed only to students enrolled in the class, (2) no fee, other than a per page copying charge, is paid by the students, (3) the author and the Lewis & Clark Law Review are identified on each copy, and (4) copyright notice is affixed to each copy.
Please note …
The views expressed by authors in the Lewis & Clark Law Review do not necessarily reflect those of the review’s Editorial Board.