Coronavirus Information and Update: Spring 2021 Plans

Wildlife Protection

Across the world, wild animals are at risk due to wildlife trafficking, habitat destruction, deforestation, and other forms of exploitation. The Global Law Alliance does a diverse array of international wildlife protection work, focused on addressing key threats facing wild animals, such as: direct exploitation, habitat conservation, the wildlife trade, poaching, the extinction crisis, and more.

Relevant Work

  • The Global Law Alliance filed a Petition under the Pelly Amendment to protect endangered pangolins. The Petition asks the U.S. to certify that China’s pangolin trade violates the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Pangolins are the most heavily trafficked mammals in the world. These scaly mammals are consumed in China as a luxury meat, and pangolin scales are used in traditional Chinese medicine. Despite recent actions by China, legal exemptions and poor enforcement allow continued pangolin trade.
  • Professors Lyman and Fromherz have developed and provide a comprehensive capacity-building program that supports judges, prosecutors, and ministerial officials in strengthening and enforcing wildlife laws around the world. The Global Law Alliance conducts trainings across Latin America and Africa for judges, prosecutors, investigators, and enforcement officers, including police, customs, and others that play a role in anti-trafficking efforts.
  • Professor Lyman and Fromherz routinely work with governments and key partners to assess and address gaps in wildlife legislation and ancillary legal tools. Recent projects have focused on Angola, Malawi, several countries in West Africa, Bolivia, Peru, and other countries in Latin America. 
  • Working with the ABA-Rule of Law Initiative and partner organizations, Fromherz published an analysis of laws and practices available to combat wildlife trafficking in Bolivia and conducted related trainings with prosecutors.
  • The Global Law Alliance works to ensure that CITES fulfills its mandate to its fullest for the protection of wildlife. For example, supported by a brief from Professor Lyman and clinic students, CITES Parties found that Japan had been violating the treaty for over ten years with respect to its import of sei whale meat and blubber. The consequence of this finding was the withdrawal of Japan’s commercial whaling hunt from the high seas and hundreds fewer whales taken annually.
  • Professors Lyman and Fromherz have published a legal opinion that examines options to either amend CITES or to add a protocol in order to address the role that wildlife trade plays in zoonotic disease risk.