The Right to Bee—Stingless Bees in Peru Achieve Legal Rights
This latest development in the Rights of Nature movement gives key Amazonian pollinators important protections.

By Courtney McCoy and Erica Lyman
In a monumental recent development, Peru’s stingless bees were granted rights, representing an important milestone in the Rights of Nature movement. Under ordinances implementing the Declaration of the Rights of Stingless Bees, the bees now have the legal right to exist and flourish, maintain healthy populations, and live in a pollution-free environment with ecologically stable climatic conditions. Along with this, lawsuits may be brought on the bees’ behalf if they face threats or harm. Thus far, the protective ordinances have been enacted in two Peruvian municipalities—first, in Satipo’s Avireri-Vraem Biosphere Reserve and second, in Nauta.
The stingless bees pollinate more than 80% of the Amazon forest’s flora—playing a critical role in rainforest survival, ecosystem health, and biodiversity. Stingless bee species, which total about 500, are the oldest species of bees on the planet. While the various species can be found in tropical regions across the world, about half call the Amazon home. Under the laws, the bees are protected across a large swathe of the Peruvian Amazon and Andes mountains—the Avireri-Vraem Biosphere Reserve, alone, is 16,000 square miles.
The ordinances establishing the bees rights came about through a collaboration with indigenous Peruvian communities including the Asháninka and Kukama communities in Satipo and Nauta, respectively. These communities (and others that existed in pre-Columbian times) have cultivated stingless bees for centuries. Unfortunately, the bees are becoming scarcer. Community members report searching for hours to find the bees that were once common. The bees’ decline is the result of a deadly combination of deforestation, pesticide use, climate change, and being outcompeted by introduced (stinging) European bees. Despite the bees far distance from areas of pesticide use, their honey contains traces of such substances, indicating the extent of drift and exposure.
Taken together, the shifts in our relationship with biodiversity and the environment reflected in these laws represents a shift toward the type of transformational change that the International Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) has been telling us is necessary since 2019. Historically, wildlife, biodiversity, and environmental protection laws center humans first, and the animals, plants, and environment second at best. And while these laws have worked to advance some wildlife and environmental protection, whether they are the solution to the world’s unfolding biodiversity crisis is in question.
In contrast, laws and regulations premised on a Rights of Nature approach resituate short-term human and corporate needs and short-term economics such that wildlife and ecosystems are centered as the subjects of the law. When implemented and enforced with intention, such laws shift who bears the burden of adjustment. In these laws, the question is not how much take and harm can a population of wild animals absorb but rather how do humans need to adjust behaviors and business as usual to accommodate the need of wild animals or ecosystems, or in this case, the stingless bees of the Amazon.
The Global Law Alliance for Animals and the Environment (GLA) has long advocated for the Rights of Nature approach and its recognition of the rights of wild animals to exist and thrive in their natural environments. Our scholarship was cited in Ecuador’s landmark decision to recognize that the Rights of Nature under the Ecuadorian constitution extend to wild animals, and we’ve written about how legislation in Panama that grants rights to sea turtles represents a further development in the movement.
In Peru, hope exists that other municipalities may follow Satipo and Nauta’s example. A global petition even calls on Peru to implement a national law. Already, the country recognizes stingless bees as species of national interest, granting them various protections and recognizing their economic value. The grant of legal rights for Peru’s stingless bees has also spurred interest from groups wanting to create similar protections for bees in Bolivia, the Netherlands, and the United States. We look forward to the Rights of Nature movement’s continued expansion and development to give wild animals the protections they deserve.

The Center for Animal Law Studies (CALS) was founded in 2008 with a mission to educate the next generation of animal law advocates and advance animal protection through the law. With vision and bold risk-taking, CALS has since developed into a world-renowned animal law epicenter. CALS’ Alumni-in-Action from 30 countries are making a difference for animals around the world. CALS is a self-funded Center within the law school operating under the Lewis & Clark College 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, and is able to provide these educational opportunities through donations and grants.
Center for Animal Law Studies is located in Wood Hall on the Law Campus.
MSC: 51
email cals@lclark.edu
voice 503-768-6960
Center for Animal Law Studies
Lewis & Clark Law School
10101 S. Terwilliger Boulevard MSC 51
Portland OR 97219
More Stories

Analyzing Portland’s Proposed Force-Fed Foie Gras Ban
In this piece, Visiting Assistant Professor, Hira Jaleel, and Law Scholars for Change law clerk, Frannie von Friedeberg (2L) address common questions about the proposed ban.

Registration Is Open for the Comparative Animal Law Symposium, March 17-18, 2026
The Center for Animal Law Studies will co-host the 4th Annual Comparative Animal Law Symposium on March 17-18, 2026. The Symposium will be held virtually, is free to attend, and is open to the public.

Reflections on CITES at 50
Professor Erica Lyman looks to the future of CITES and its continued promise for wildlife

Save the Date for the International Aquaculture Law & Policy Symposium
Mark your calendar for June 5, 2026 to advance protections for aquatic animals

